Rider
Review: 1996 Honda CBR F3 |
by Marcus
Miller
Associate Editor
Beginner Bikes Magazine
I have
owned for the past six years a 1996 F3 (purple/yellow) and my wife
has had a 97 F3 (red). We acquired both bikes new from dealers.
The following is my personal views based on reflections of both
of our experiences. Additionally, I have been an instructor for
the CA state motorcycle safety program (MSF variant) for the past
three years.
The
Good |
Awesome
Bike!
Engine:
Hella
strong-nearly 100 hp, Honda quality - over 60K miles on the
'96 nothing more than change oil, sparkplugs, and other routine
maintenance. Will out accelerate any car costing less than $100,000
on the street and some that cost more. Top end power comes on
strong from about 9-13k rpm.
Suspension:
Good compromise between track and street. Tends to be a bit
taught for street riding - expansion joints can get painful
or at least annoying after a while. Have been on track twice
with the '96 - scraping pegs easily and rock solid while leaned
over.
Seating
Position:
Only
modestly comfortable which is considered quite good for these
race replica bikes. I'm 6'1", 32" inseam and 200 lbs
and have ridden friends' GSXR-600 and R6 and definitely find
the CBR more comfortable. Pillion gets a reasonable (by sport
bike standards) seat. '96 seat much more comfortable than '97.
Ride:
Can
be anywhere from a mild-mannered scooter to a roaring super
sport all depending on how you ride it. I love it for this instantly
changeable nature: cruise around town in higher gears and the
stock exhaust is whisper quiet. Have had car drivers ask me
what I did to make it so quiet - they loved it! Even at 4-6K
the bike has lots of power - enough to just roll on the throttle
to smoothly leave traffic behind. But, downshift a gear or two
and bring the engine up and you're outta there at warp speed
The brakes are wonderful on these bikes - very strong and offering
linear response with good feedback, they can stop on a dime
if you're good enough.
The
Bad |
Engine:
'97
is a little jerky in the off-on throttle transition, which is
annoying in corners. Instructor caveat here is that the engine
is he11a strong and can easily get the rider going much faster
than they mean to. The difference between accelerating through
a curve successfully and too much gas can be as little as rolling
on just 1/32" more.
Suspension:
Tough
on long trips - it tolerates highways but much prefers back
road twisties.
Seating
Position:
Takes
its toll. Spirited riding means you'll be looking for a place
to stop after an hour max and stretch out. Consider marrying
a chiropractor or at the very least a masseuse.
The
Ugly |
Looks:
I
love the looks, personally. Purple and Yellow scheme (especially
Smokin' Joe's) is the best-looking bike out there. The all red
is nice for its more mature and less flashy look. The problem
with owning one of these bikes is that they look fast just standing
still. Draws unwanted attention from the law. Many who ride
different style bikes don't like the "boy racer" looks.
Weight:
While
"light", the sport bikes tend to carry their weight
relatively high compared to other bikes. Also, the seat tends
to be high (along with pegs) so that you're out of the way enough
to lean the bike over to insane angles. My wife never got comfortable
with this and was one of the reasons she only put 2,500 miles
on the bike to present.
Verdict |
I've
absolutely LOVED every minute I've spent aboard my bike. After
all this time, I still haven't tapped the limits of what this
bike can do - probably never will. I'm very happy with the bike
and plan to keep it forever. My wife thought she would love having
one too after riding on the back of mine and learning on another
bike, but she found the bike to be too much for her: too much
weight, too high up, too intimidating. These bikes are very powerful
- they are basically barely street legal racing machines. As such,
the acceleration is brutal, the braking is phenomenal and the
suspension and riding position are "no compromise".
What this means, unfortunately, is that it takes quite a bit of
skill to be able to handle them. I do NOT recommend them as first
bikes for people learning how to ride. The bikes are extremely
competent - they can do things beyond what the rider is capable
of doing. Yet the bike is so powerful and competent that it's
easy to get lulled into thinking you're as good as the bike. Throttle
input needs to be very smooth and carefully metered. Braking REQUIRES
smooth squeezes - grabbing will bite you: quickly and hard! Just
as one doesn't give a new car driver the keys to an Indy racecar
to learn how to drive, neither should one throw a leg over this
bike when starting out. My wife almost left motorcycling because
this was the wrong bike for her. We went out and got a different
bike that is much better suited to her that SHE wanted and she's
much happier now (and so am I ).
[return
to the top]
|